|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Click for Google +1 Many people enjoyed the 1997 film The Wedding Singer, and while it was one of the first to launch new interests in the eighties, it is still highly flawed to anyone who lived through that period. If you are going to dredge up nostalgia to promote a film, you should try to get a few facts right. The problem is that the Wedding Singer has mistakenly taken culture of from 79-85 and presented as a snapshot of 1985 (if you enjoy big words, then you would call this an anachronism). While picking flaws in films is a favourite past time of many film junkies and some times it can get very tedious, few invite criticism like the Wedding Singer. It was deliberately marketed as being a film about living in 1985 and promoting itself as accurate reflection of living in that period. After posting The Wedding singer music which deals with musical flaws in the film, many visitors sent in emails about countless other flaws in the film. They won't all be listed, but here are a few to get started. One of the characteristics of the early 80s was that fashion changed quite rapidly. It was a sin to be wearing the fashion that was more than six months old. Fashion from 1980 was completely out by 1982. The Wedding Singer was set in 1985, so to even think that new romantics were still lurking in by this time was simply untrue. Admittedly the town where the Wedding Singer was set could have been a retro heaven, or just very daggy. However, the film was promoted as an accurate reflection of living in 1985 - not an exception. It is an odd aspect about this film that if it had been set just two or three years earlier, then it would have been a great 80s experience. It is a mystery why they chose such a bland year as 1985 - perhaps it was the only way that Dead Or Alive's you Spin Me Round could be included. So in addition to the music, what are some of the other faults?
|